Why every sourced article needs your approval

Articles that come from a source always land in Pending Review, whatever your org's usual approval policy is. Sourcing raises the bar on review; it never lowers it.

That is deliberate, for three reasons:

Your masthead carries it. Repeating someone else's reporting is publishing it, and responsibility travels to whoever published it - not to the outlet you got it from. Crediting them does not change that, so a person decides each time.

Publishing does more than you might expect. When an article goes live it can also become a page on your Builder site and go out to your connected social accounts. A retraction does not undo a share, so the moment to catch a problem is before it publishes, not after.

The draft is written from a summary, not the full story. Turtini works from what the publisher offers for syndication - their own headline and summary - so your article is your writing around a short quote and a link back. An editor is the one who knows whether it is right and whether it is worth running.

What the byline says: your newsroom, marked as AI-assisted, plus the source publisher, the reporter's name when the feed carries one, and a link to the original. Readers can always see where it came from and go read it.